A CAPPELLA 101
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Guest Bloggers
  • Contact
  • Terms of Service

POLL- In Live A Cappella, What Counts as Cheating?

7/28/2011

17 Comments

 
Picture
Take the Poll! 

Technology is a pervasive and growing part of live performance for a cappella groups, but how much is too much? At what point do you feel that you're just not watching a live a cappella group anymore? 

Take the poll and let the world know where you draw the line.

For this poll, "cheating" is defined as any act which would make you personally feel as if you weren't really watching a live a cappella act, but instead something else. 

Please check all that apply.
17 Comments
Wes Carroll link
7/28/2011 06:45:22 am

I don't see the value of the distinction. Do you enjoy performances that fit an arbitrary set of "a cappella" criteria more than one that does not? Of course not.

So... who cares? ...and why?

Reply
Live in care link
8/19/2012 07:19:13 pm

You are sharing, such a great information about the
POLL .A CAPPELLA I like the way you explain the things. Thanks a lot...

Reply
pure asian garcinia link
9/8/2014 01:35:48 pm

I was guessing if you could write a little more on this. Although it was a superb effort. But, I'd be very grateful if you could elaborate a bit more.

Reply
acapellaluv
3/14/2016 04:16:37 am

What do the biggest aca-groups use....like Ptx, Home Free, Straight No Chaser, Perpetuum Jazzile, Naturally 7, Rockapella, Voiceplay, Take 6, The Real Group, etc?
.
In general...?

Reply
Jonathan Minkoff
3/15/2016 12:22:53 pm

Some of the biggest groups use voices on microphones with octavizer on bass, eq on all parts, a little reverb and delay and that's it. Some use tracks that either they hear and you don't or that are actually played to the audience. As one example, Take 6 recently performed in NY with instrumental tracks and also played some instruments. Not so aca! Hope that helps!

Jonathan Minkoff link
7/28/2011 07:19:36 am

The topic of "cheating" in live a cappella is a frequent topic of discussion, particularly among those who make a cappella music.

That's who cares.

Why?

I think people are interested in defining their art form.

This poll isn't to determine whether good music is being made. It's just to see where people generally feel the boundaries are between a cappella and "something else" in a live context.

For some people, whether Dylan played an electric guitar instead of a folk guitar made all the difference in the world.

Reply
Niels link
7/28/2011 07:48:07 am

I don't quite know how to word it, but I've had the experience that some would say (I wouldn't) that using a prerecorded click-track that activate effects, echo, harmonizer etc. at very specific times, rather than "just" having the effects that a sound engineer can manage counts more as 'cheating' than otherwise.

Reply
Sam Rogers link
7/28/2011 07:51:40 am

For me, "cheating" is changing the sound put in the microphone, as opposed to emphasizing or repeating different parts of that sound. I only very rarely cheat in my show, but I sure do love listening to cheaters!

Reply
Jo3 Oliva link
7/29/2011 04:00:11 am

Having been in a group that has used canned drums for almost 20 years I know some people think it’s cheating. They rally behind the “acappella means without instruments” cry to which I retort that it means “in the chapel style” so unless they’re singing church music they don’t get to define it any more than I do.

Personally, I cringe when I hear pre-recorded vocals being passed off as live. That bothers me only because the average audience member is being duped. When someone like Sam Rogers (it was nice to meet you in Toronto by the way, Sam) uses a looping pedal I don’t think anyone in the audience would be duped into thinking he’s actually singing all of those parts. When the girl from Sonos (I don’t know her name) drops her voice down 2 octaves to sing bass I don’t think the average audience member thinks she’s actually singing that low so I say it’s fair game.

To me, if you truly feel that you’re not severely duping an audience and can look them in the eyes when you’re mingling after a show and know in your heart that what you presented on stage was an authentic representation of “who you are” as a group then I answer No to all of the above. Just like the music has changed over the years, so does the technology and if it suits the style of an act, then they should use it in my view.

Reply
Jim Frewen
7/29/2011 07:25:25 am

Actually Joe, the meaning in both the Oxford and Webster dictionaries is "without instrumental accompniment" while the origin of the word comes from the Italian for "in chapel style". Now I don't want to argue with an Italian, about Italian, but here's the links. :-)

(I think you have to copy and paste)

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/a+cappella

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/a%20cappella

But I agree with what you are saying about duping. I think the word is integrity. There should be intregity in a live performance.

Using a drum machine is not an integrity issue, as long as you are not telling your audience, you are making all of the sounds live yourselves. As an a cappella fan, I prefer that the drum machine not be used. But general music fans might not care and enjoy the show. I will still enjoy your show, beccause I love harmony. My faescination though, is what can be accomplished by the human voice by itslef.

Live looping is obvious to the audience and the performer is doing it on the spot live as he/she goes. Using an engineer to do the live looping is less authentic but still authentic, in that he performer is still making the sounds live, albeit with help in looping.



But using pre-recorded vocal tracks, to maked it sound like there are more voices is deceptive. It's not live.

As for what the engineer does with sound of a performing voice, as long as it only enhances a performer's already existing talent, and it doesn't make someome like me who sings bad, sound good. Autotunig could make me sound good, right? :-)

In the end, for me as an audience member, I want to come away from a show feeling that the amazing performance I have just seen is credible as a live performance. that performaners blew me away on their own.

Reply
voxleo
6/16/2013 06:00:19 am

". My faescination though, is what can be accomplished by the human voice by itslef."

This ^^. The looping is pushing it, but I'd forgive a simple copy of the just captured live material being looped in a live performance PROVIDED it is not just to make the sound bigger or like there are more singers, but that it makes something possible like singing harmony or in a canon with oneself as part of the live show and the audience is aware of its use for that purpose.

I don't mind alterations to the "performance space" such as mics which make it possible for people to hear what there is to be heard, but I don't feel as though the sounds should be altered directly for correction or enhancement. That part should be up to the artists to impress or not as they are able to do, particularly if you are speaking of a contest format and not just casual listening.

Reply
Dylan Bell link
7/30/2011 03:45:33 am

Hi folks

I said I'd do it, so, here goes... my latest article: "Rules In A Cappella: Who Gives a Fa-La-La?". Head over to http://www.dylanbell.ca to view it. Jon, feel free to repost in your "Guest Blogger" section if you like. Enjoy!

-dB

Reply
casino gokkasten link
10/28/2012 07:48:33 pm

I'm sure that if someone wants to study this topic deeply, he can feel free to contact you personally.

Reply
acapellaluv
9/15/2015 01:52:25 am

Heard Home Free live, with & w/o mics: Awesome!! Here's an orig. song, sung 3 diff. places,can you tell me what's used/not used to enhance their sound? UTUBE: Home Free: 'I've Seen'-1) (official vid)..2) 'Sing Off'(bhs
interview)..3) 'Crazy Life Tour'..Pls answer here...Thx !!
.**P.S.
Watch their insane beatboxer(plays trumpet,bass,keys, drums!), in action: 'Adam Rupp Drum Solo 8-17-15' !!!!!


Reply
Jonathan Minkoff
9/15/2015 01:23:36 pm

Home Free are good friends and great singers. If you can't tell if they are using enhancement or not, then maybe it doesn't matter! If it does matter, write them a note and ask. They're super friendly!

Reply
acapellaluv
10/4/2015 10:02:43 pm

Thx for answering this HomeFry who's just wondering.
Quiet Adam's so crisp & solid..Watching the vid, what do you think of his vp skills? :)

acapellaluv
10/4/2015 09:58:05 pm

Thx for answering this HomeFry who's just wondering, Quiet Adam's unbelievably crisp/solid..Watching the vid, what'd you think of his vp skills? :)

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Jonathan Minkoff
      &  
    Guest Bloggers

    The ultimate "how to" 
    for everything a cappella.


    What's Up?

     We're thrilled at how many views we're getting! (Wow!) But less than 1% comment! What did you think? How can we improve? Post  to let us know! Or contact us here.


    What's Next?

    Recording Tips


    What's Shakin'?

    Let us know all about your latest, greatest a cappella project here.


    Archives

    February 2015
    April 2014
    November 2013
    June 2013
    June 2012
    February 2012
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011


    Categories

    All
    A Cappella
    A Cappella Competition
    Arrangement
    Arrangements
    Arranging
    Cheating
    College Competition
    Compete
    Competition
    Competitions
    Composer
    Compulsory License
    Copyright
    Copyright Act
    Credits
    Digital Download
    Distribution
    Downloading
    Effects
    Effects Pedals
    Fair Use
    Finding A Group To Join
    Free Music
    Fundraising
    Harmony Sweepstakes
    High School Competition
    Legal
    License
    Licensing
    Liner Notes
    Live
    Live A Cappella
    Live Performance
    Mistakes
    Money
    Nbc
    Performance
    Permission
    Philosophy
    Poll
    Public Domain
    Rights
    Season 3
    Singing Competition
    Sing-Off
    Singstrong
    Sonos
    Sony
    Sound Equipment
    Starting Off In A Cappella
    Straight No Chaser
    Streaming
    Technology
    The Sing-Off
    Top 10
    Voca People
    Www.acappella101.com
    X-Factor
    Youtube

    RSS Feed

© Jonathan Minkoff. All rights reserved. Disclaimer
Nothing on this site, whether an article or a comment, or otherwise, is legal or tax advice. It's merely a general discussion of the law. If you have a specific question or situation requiring legal or tax counsel, you need to speak to a specific lawyer, personally, who will ask you specific questions about your specific situation which will allow him or her to do specific research in order to give you specific advice.